← All programmes

FDE FOR PROFESSIONALS / ADVANCED EDITION

Bring your
experience.
Build what
comes next.

Advanced Forward Deployed Engineering.

Keep your domain depth. Add the AI engineering, client judgement and delivery ownership to build systems enterprises can use.

Standalone programme · Skills-based entry · Live practitioner learning

THE DELIVERY MINDSET 01 → 05
YOUR EXPERIENCE
Production AIClient judgement · Delivery ownership
QualitySecurityOperations
DiscoverEngineerValidateDeployAdopt

A working system. A defensible decision. An accountable handover.

16 weeks

Proposed learning plan

12

Advanced modules

84 hours

Live learning & review

156 hours

Projects & preparation

YOUR EXPERIENCE IS THE STARTING POINT

Keep your domain depth. Expand your impact.

Choose the background closest to your work. See what already transfers, what you will add, and the kind of engagement you could build.

01 / YOU BRING

A foundation to build on.

Infrastructure, incidents, automation and release discipline.

02 / YOU ADD

The advanced delivery layer.

Model behaviour, retrieval, evaluations and workflow discovery.

03 / YOU BUILD

AI incident-triage copilot

Your experience shapes the emphasis; demonstrated coding and AI skills determine entry. There is no fixed years-of-experience minimum. Need a foundation-first pathway? Explore FDE for Freshers →

THE PROPOSED LEARNING JOURNEY

12 modules. Evidence at every step.

One engagement evolves through four blocks: from the first discovery conversation to a working system, an operating handover and an individual defence.

01Discovery & commercial judgement6h live · 10h project
WHAT YOU WILL ENGINEER
  • Map the current workflow, decision owners, exception paths and data access; establish a measurable baseline.
  • Compare deterministic automation, classical ML and LLM approaches; write explicit stop/go criteria.
  • Specify acceptance tests, exclusions, dependency risks, change requests and a phased commercial proposal.
PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

Discovery brief, value tree, RACI and a statement of work with measurable acceptance criteria.

THE FAILURE / DECISION CHALLENGE

Defend scope when a sponsor adds a new requirement halfway through discovery.

Value at work: Turn ambiguous requests into a delivery commitment that engineering, operations and the sponsor can evaluate.

02Model strategy & context engineering6h live · 10h project
WHAT YOU WILL ENGINEER
  • Benchmark a baseline, small model and stronger model on the same tasks; route by quality, cost and latency.
  • Design context budgets, structured outputs, session memory, compaction and expiration; separate user and tenant state.
  • Choose retrieval, fine-tuning or a non-LLM model using error analysis; treat LoRA and private inference as elective investigations.
PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

Model decision record and a reproducible quality-latency-cost comparison with a context policy.

THE FAILURE / DECISION CHALLENGE

Handle a provider outage and an unexpectedly long document without losing the task contract.

Value at work: Explain which model belongs in a workflow and what evidence would justify changing it.

03Enterprise retrieval & data contracts8h live · 14h project
WHAT YOU WILL ENGINEER
  • Build hybrid retrieval and reranking; compare chunking, metadata filtering, query rewriting and citations.
  • Enforce document access controls before retrieval; manage freshness, deletes, lineage and tenant boundaries.
  • Add OCR/table extraction and schema contracts; evaluate retrieval relevance separately from answer quality.
PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE

Permission-aware knowledge service, ingestion pipeline, lineage map and retrieval benchmark.

THE FAILURE / DECISION CHALLENGE

A revoked document must stop appearing; an unanswerable query must yield a supported abstention.

Value at work: Make enterprise knowledge useful without exposing restricted documents or relying on stale evidence.

240 hoursTotal planned learning
~15 hours/weekRoughly 5 live + 10 independent

The final block averages about 18 hours/week. The 40-hour capstone is included in the total. Bridges, electives or a reduced weekly pace may extend the proposed sequence.

ONE SUBSTANTIAL ENGAGEMENT

A problem you can explain deeply.

Choose a domain you understand. Then own the discovery, integration, evaluation and handover. Every route uses the same delivery standard.

DEVOPS / SRE / CLOUD

AI incident-triage copilot

A fictional enterprise has fragmented alerts, outdated runbooks and a growing ticket queue. Build an assistant that gathers evidence, proposes an action and records an accountable decision.

CLIENT SIMULATION / SANDBOX BUILD
  1. 01Discover
  2. 02Retrieve
  3. 03Recommend
  4. 04Approve
  5. 05Recover
WHAT YOU ENGINEER

Versioned ingestion, access filters, ticket integrations and scoped MCP actions. Add resumable execution, idempotency and an evidence-linked operations dashboard.

WHAT YOU MEASURE

Completion and abstention, p95 recommendation time, denied actions, cost per correct task and triage effort against a manual baseline.

STRESS TEST

Inject a misleading runbook, a tool timeout and a repeated approval. Show recovery and an explainable decision history.

Use synthetic data or an approved, anonymised employer case. Agree data permissions, intellectual property and portfolio disclosure first. Specialist electives are selected only when the capstone has a measurable need.

WHAT YOU LEAVE WITH

Work that survives technical questioning.

A reviewer should be able to inspect the work, rerun the evaluation and understand your decisions.

01 / EVIDENCE PACK

Frame the engagement

Discovery brief, stakeholder map, value baseline, statement of work and acceptance-test contract.

02 / EVIDENCE PACK

Make it reproducible

Architecture diagrams, decision records, versioned code, infrastructure and a repeatable setup.

03 / EVIDENCE PACK

Show the quality

Evaluation dataset, measured results, release report, threat model and adversarial test evidence.

04 / EVIDENCE PACK

Prove it can operate

Cost model, operational dashboard, incident review, customer handover and a 90-day adoption plan.

PROPOSED ASSESSMENT

Build. Break.
Defend.

Engineering judgement and delivery evidence shape the assessment. Every learner explains their individual contribution.

The brochure proposes 75/100 overall plus mandatory authorization, reproducibility and recovery checks. Final grading, attendance, reassessment and certification rules require confirmation.

Engineering & integration25%

Correctness, contracts, permissions, recovery and reproducible deployment.

AI quality & evaluation25%

Representative tasks, calibrated scoring, grounded answers and release gates.

Security & operations20%

Threat controls, isolation, observability, cost and incident recovery.

Client & business delivery20%

Scope, acceptance criteria, economics, demo and adoption plan.

Handover & individual defence10%

Runbooks, architecture decisions and evidence of your contribution.

TRY A DELIVERY DECISION

Make the business case inspectable.

A smaller review burden or stronger adoption can change the value of the same system. Explore the brochure’s illustrative teaching scenario.

Assumptions: 20 min manual work → 12 min assisted work; ₹1,200/hour labour value; ₹30,000/month operating costs.

ILLUSTRATIVE MONTHLY CAPACITY120 hours

Potential capacity released

Net capacity value1,14,000
Tasks × adoption × (manual − assisted − extra review time) ÷ 60. Capacity value deducts operating costs.

Illustrative, not a course ROI or salary forecast. Released capacity is not automatically cash savings. Account for implementation, transition, quality and risk before making a business decision.

ENTRY BY DEMONSTRATED SKILLS

Your next step starts with evidence.

Use this checklist to prepare for a readiness conversation. Years of service do not create automatic exemptions.

0 / 6

Select the statements that describe what you can demonstrate today.

This is a self-check, not an admission decision. A targeted bridge may fill a gap. If you need broader foundations, explore FDE for Freshers.

Discuss my starting point ↗

Taught by practitioners, not presenters

Both instructors hold full-time senior data science roles. You are learning from people who ship this work every week.

PK
Pankit Kumar
Lead Instructor
Sr. Data Scientist, Parexel (a Goldman Sachs–backed company)

10 years in Data Science & AI, building and shipping production systems in regulated pharma/clinical environments. Freelance trainer at BIA, AnalytixLabs and Scaler — he has taught this material to thousands of working professionals.

Data ScienceMLOpsClient deliveryTeaching
IS
Ishaan Sharma
Co-Instructor — AI / GenAI
Senior Data Scientist, Nuvo AI (Meril Group)

Close to a decade across NLP, computer vision and Generative AI. Microsoft Azure ML Scholar. Works on production AI systems in medical devices and healthcare, and leads the agentic-AI and MCP modules.

GenAINLP / CVAgents & MCPLLMOps

BEFORE YOU ENROL

Clear questions. A better-fit decision.

Confirm the calendar, prerequisite bridges, lab costs and final programme terms with admissions.

Who can join?

IT professionals with Python-service, Git, SQL and HTTP API skills, service deployment or operations experience, and working knowledge of retrieval, tool use and evaluations. A readiness conversation identifies any preparation needed.

Is there a minimum years-of-experience requirement?

No fixed minimum. Demonstrated skills and readiness matter more than years or job title.

How much time should I allow?

The proposed schedule is 16 weeks and 240 hours: 84 live and 156 project/preparation hours. Average commitment is 15 hours per week; the final four weeks are around 18 hours per week.

Is the schedule confirmed?

It is the proposed advanced-edition schedule. Confirm the cohort calendar, fees and final assessment terms with your counsellor before enrolling.

Will this guarantee a senior role or salary?

No. The curriculum develops advanced delivery capabilities; it does not guarantee a title, employer, seniority or salary.

Will I repeat beginner material?

Entry is evidence-based, with targeted bridges for missing foundations. Substitutions and exemptions are agreed after assessment; years of service do not create an automatic exemption.

Can I use a problem from my employer?

Yes, as an approved, anonymised or synthetic case. Agree data permissions, intellectual property and what can be shown publicly before bringing work material into class or a portfolio.

What should I confirm before enrolling?

The final calendar, programme fee, cloud/API lab costs, prerequisite bridges, live attendance, assessment, reassessment and certificate wording. FDE for Professionals has its own commercial offer.

YOUR NEXT DELIVERY RESPONSIBILITY

Bring your experience.
Build what comes next.

Tell us about your role, a project you own and one business problem you want to solve. We’ll help you map the right starting point.

Skills-based entryProposed 16-week planFees shared on a call
Compare the two FDE pathways →
Discuss the Advanced FDE pathway

Get the detailed syllabus and a conversation about your readiness, workload and the proposed cohort.

By submitting you agree to be contacted about our programmes. No spam, ever.