Test a multi-agent handoff against a single-agent baseline
In this article (5 sections)
Multiple agents add handoffs, duplicated context and coordination failure. They should be compared with a simpler single-agent or workflow design on the same acceptance tests.
Preserve a no-selection result
The agent controls lab uses authored outcomes.
from agent_cases import multi_agent_case
result = multi_agent_case()
assert result["eligible"] == []
assert result["selected"] is None
assert result["agent_runtime_executed"] is False
print(result["decision"])The single fixture passes 17/20 at cost 4.2; multi passes 18/20 at 10.4. The gate requires 18 passes and cost at most 8, so neither wins. These are not live-agent results.
Define the handoff benefit
Use multiple agents only when specialisation, parallel independent work or adversarial review could improve a named failure. Give each a typed input/output, limited tools and clear owner. Preserve user authority across handoffs.
Compare task success, critical invariants, tool/model calls, tokens, latency, cost, handoff loss and recovery. Inspect whether the receiving agent gets evidence and constraints rather than a lossy prose summary.
Test simpler alternatives
Compare with one agent using tools, a deterministic workflow and parallel functions. Complexity can be rejected even when quality rises slightly. If multi-agent wins, bound delegation and trace every branch.
The Generative & Agentic AI course treats multi-agent design as an evaluated option, not a default deliverable.
Exercise
Run single and multi-agent candidates on 30 cases with identical tools and model. Predeclare quality and cost gates, report handoff failures and retain no-selection as a valid outcome.
Continue learning
This article is part of the Agent workflows and state sequence. Use the neighbouring tasks when you need the prerequisite or the next application.
- Review the prerequisite or neighbouring task in Agent memory: separate facts, preferences and temporary state.
- Continue with Bound delegation depth and tool-call volume.
Reference: Microsoft AutoGen documentation.
Pankit Kumar has 10 years in Data Science & AI, building and shipping production systems in regulated pharma and clinical environments. He is a freelance trainer at Boston Institute of Analytics, AnalytixLabs and Scaler, and has taught this material to thousands of working professionals.
This article is part of our Generative & Agentic AI programme — 3 months. Add practical GenAI, retrieval and agent-building skills to your existing toolkit.
Explore Generative & Agentic AI